BSD It’s broken! A borrower used the borrowed item properly, but it broke due to work. As long as the work was reasonable and suitable for the item, the borrower is not liable. Yet, if the item “died” (i.e. broke) unexpectedly and out of “working hours”, the borrower is liable. What’s the logic here???
Also, Why did Rava tell his students that they work for him and not him working for them?
Watch this video by R’ Akiva Teichtal of the Ahavas Shalom community, and get it all right.
